Hey John,
well said. I think we need to find ways to motivate younger people to partake in the whole political process.
There may well be a need for reform, but Proportional Representation is not the answer. Just ask the Italians.
New Zealand introduced it as well, and now they are desperately looking at ways of getting rid of it because
it just doesn't work! Definitely one of those ideas that sound good in theory but do not stand up in the real world.
Unfortunately I do not have a working alternative. Therefore I will not decry our current system. I was
taught, if you don't have a solution to the problem, keep quiet.
As to the DVLA issue:
The DVLA rely on Regulation 27(1)(e) of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations 2002:
The Secretary of State may make any particulars contained in the register available for use—
by any person who can show to the satisfaction of the Secretary of State that he has reasonable cause for wanting the particulars to be made available to him.
The DVLA will, therefore, release data to any PPC who is a member of an Approved Trade Association (ATA), of which there are currently two, the BPA and the IPC.
It is assumed that, by virtue of holding current membership, they abide by the relevant Code of Practice, and are therefore deemed to have 'reasonable cause' to request keeper data.
With over 5 million requests being made each year, at £2.50 a time, this represents a significant income stream for the DVLA, who have a dedicated Data Sharing department, with the top bods being paid bonuses based on the volume of data sold.
The ICO are fully aware of all this, and see nothing wrong with it.
AS the author said "Trying to bring either of these organisations to account, is like nailing jelly to a wall"
Enough said!