Hi,
I'm guessing that Rovers intended the S2 to be more desirable than the S1, and similarly with the S3 after the S2.
Personally, I have never been a big fan of the 80", as I found the vertic
al movement of my feet to be uncomfortable. I want more legroom for the driver.
My own preference would be a S1 (88") body, rebuilt onto an S3 running. chassis (steering lock, all syncro gearbox, and presumably easier new spares). I don't like the "barrel sides" on the S2 and S3. On the other hand, I have always found P1 engines to be unnaturally complicated. (I believe the inlet over exhaust valve layout was to enable the fitting of bigger valves, or maybe it just sounds "more efficient".
My 1953 (if I remember correctly) Rover 60 had 1997cc P1 engine, claimed to develop just short of 60BHP. I drove it from the dealers to the nearest petrol station, and added a gallon of petrol. I ran out of fuel 10 miles later.
Come back little Minivan ... all is foregiven.
I'm feeling stirrings in my lions. Lets get the Freelander MOT'd, then persuade Barbara to let me swap it for an S2 project.
Has anyone ever converted an S2 into a WAV?
602