Won't you need a transfer box on the tail of the gearbox anyway, to drop the output to a position that keeps the rear prop at a 'more normal' angle?
Hi Nick,
Short answer ... "Yes" ... and the off-set prop, and chassis cross-members will be a PITA. (A 109" might enable things to be less "contrived")
And "Yes" again, before you ask, the angle of the rear prop might be a bit extreme if I fit a mundane auto box with a long "tail" poking through the big hole in the cross-member. But I'd rather consider such mods today, that "smack my forehead" after I'm commmited.
Remember, the project vehicle is a 4x2, which still has the transfer box, but no front out-put gubbins.
My desire for an auto-box is to facilitate Barbara driving it after her knee replacements, which now appear to be increasingly unlikely. They won't operate unless she is walking. She WAS walking when first "observed" at the clinic ... middle of last year. Now she can scarcely walk at all, and then with extreme pain, and risk of falling. IF she COULD walk, I think she would forget the operations, and live with the pain. Her gammy right arm prevents her from using most walking aids, nor a hand propelled wheel-chair. She is returning her new invalid buggy as unsuitable for HER needs. The Vendor is being extremely good about it, and Barbara is taking up his offer to demonstrate alternatives. (Barbara used to be the Contracts Manager at DVLA .. just one of her former lives ... with an obscene mandate, and was ready to make a fight of it).
Early 109s had the facility to adapt the rear wheel brakes to foot and hand operation. But I don't want to go there, mainly because I don't know how small a wheel I can fit over the 11" drums. (I presume they could be easily adapted to "fiddle sticks" if you want to play in the mud)r.
602